⚽ Bursaspor Squad, Player Ratings & Formation (2026-2027)

⏱️
WEEK 13 FIXTURE Bursaspor vs Bandırmaspor
📅 Kick-off: 31.10.2026 - 16:00 (TFF)
⚡ View Predicted Lineups & Match Center →
✓ LEAGUE SELECTED
✓ TEAM SELECTED
⚙️ DISPLAY FILTER
⚽ Bursaspor
🇹🇷 19 Local 🌍 7 Foreign 💰 €18.63M
⚡ ACTIVE PLAYERS ONLY
CENTRAL FORWARD
🌍Iheanacho 1,023' 101
TREmir Kaan 153' 61
TRBaran 129' 86
LEFT WINGER
🌍Boutrah 787' 82
ATTACKING MIDFIELD
🌍Lincoln 970' 170
RIGHT WINGER
TRHalil 655' 44
TRHüseyin 370' 31
🌍Saranic 169' 55
CENTRAL MIDFIELD
TREyüp 613' 48
TRSoner 327' 30
🌍Baker 188' 147
DEFENSIVE MIDFIELD
🌍Elitin 1,012' 155
LEFT BACK
TRBarış 847' 93
🌍Bayramov 256' 267
CENTER BACK
TRAlperen 810' 88
TRBatuhan 656' 91
TREmirhan 424' 52
TRErtuğrul 307' 99
RIGHT BACK
TRRahmetullah 528' 58
TRZeki 526' 146
GOALKEEPER
TRKerem 1,080' 76
🟢 Strongest: Left-Back Zone
267
🔴 Weakest: Goalkeeping
76
Best XI Positional Rating Averages
Left-Back Zone 267
Midfield Line 151
Right-Back Zone 146
Attack Line (Forwards & Wingers) 102
Center-Back Pair 95
Goalkeeping 76
🎂 Top 11 Most Played Age & Mobility Profile Top XI Avg: 27.8 Yrs
📊 LEAGUE TOP 11 AGE RANK: #10 / 20
🛡️ Defensive & Anchor Line:
⚖️ Experienced (29.2)
⚙️ Central Midfield:
⚡ Young / Dynamic (24)
⚡ Attack Line:
⚖️ Experienced (29.3)
💡 Dynamic Tactical Insights
  • Left-Back Strength: Performing at high level (267).
  • Right-Back Strength: Performing at high level (146).
  • Central Fortress: Pairing is high level (95).
  • Tactical Summary: Strongest zone is Left-Back Zone, weakest is Goalkeeping.
PLAYER POS ⚽ G 🅰️ A ⏱️ MINS RAT
TR Kerem GK - - 1,080' 76
🌍 Iheanacho CF 16 3 1,023' 101
🌍 Elitin DM - 1 1,012' 155
🌍 Lincoln AM 3 6 970' 170
TR Barış LB - - 847' 93
TR Alperen CB 1 1 810' 88
🌍 Boutrah LW 1 - 787' 82
TR Batuhan CB - - 656' 91
TR Halil RW 2 1 655' 44
TR Eyüp CM - - 613' 48
TR Rahmetullah RB - 1 528' 58
TR Zeki RB - 1 526' 146
TR Emirhan CB - - 424' 52
TR Hüseyin RW 1 - 370' 31
TR Soner CM - - 327' 30
TR Ertuğrul CB - - 307' 99
🌍 Bayramov LB - - 256' 267
🌍 Baker CM 1 - 188' 147
🌍 Saranic RW - 1 169' 55
TR Emir Kaan CF - - 153' 61
TR Baran CF - - 129' 86
TR Tayfun CM - - 0' 90
TR Anıl GK - - 0' 55
TR Ahmet GK - - 0' 7
TR Adem RW - - 0' 0
TR Efe GK - - 0' 0
⚽
No Player Selected

Click on any player on the pitch or squad table to view detailed performance metrics.

-
-
0
OVERALL RATING
POSITION: -
⏱️ Time Played
0'
🎂 Age
-
⚽ Goals
0
🅰️ Assists
0
🌍 Nationality
-
💰 Market Value
€0
📅 Match-by-Match Tracker

📖 Tactical Breakdown & Story of Bursaspor

Welcome to the in-depth tactical analysis of Bursaspor. Heading into the current campaign, the club boasts an estimated total market valuation of €18.63M. The manager relies on a balanced setup comprising 19 domestic players reinforced by 7 international talents.

In the final third, Iheanacho (representing NIGERIA) stands out as the primary offensive spearhead. With 16 goals registered to his name, his clinical finishing and movement inside the penalty box remain essential to the team's match-winning ambitions.

The creative heartbeat of the squad flows through Lincoln, who leads the playmaking charts with 6 assists. His vision in transition and ability to unlock stubborn defensive blocks dictate the team's attacking rhythm.

✓ Squad balance remains structurally sound, with dependable depth across defensive anchors, midfield orchestrators, and wide attacking channels.

From an athletic and mobility standpoint, the core starting eleven records an average age of 27.8 years, which ranks them #10 out of 20 teams in the league. Operating within their physical and tactical prime, this balanced unit blends competitive maturity with sustainable stamina across high-tempo phases.

Defensively and organizationally, their strongest unit is the Left-Back Zone (carrying a formidable rating of 267), while tactical discipline in the Goalkeeping (rating: 76) will ultimately dictate their position on the table.

📰 Latest Tactical Insights & Notes for Bursaspor

Bursaspor Tactical Review: Attacking Spacing, Build-Up Rigidity & Tactical Shifts

📅 18 Oct 2026 - 14:00

Bursaspor are currently experiencing a turbulent phase marked by structural teething problems, tactical rigidity, and stark contrasts between cautious first-half performances and aggressive tactical shifts. While technical adaptations and courage in possession can completely transform their attacking flow, persistent spacing issues and individual concentration lapses continue to threaten their consistency.

Key Tactical & Squad Insights
Attacking Spacing & Runner Deficits:
  • A recurring structural flaw has been the lack of vertical runners in the final third, as advanced players frequently drop deep to demand the ball into feet rather than attacking the opponent's defensive line.
  • This positional congestion leaves the team vulnerable to rapid defensive transitions and neutralizes the natural goalscoring profiles of key forwards.
Build-Up Rigidity vs. Fluid Geometry:
  • Stubborn insistence on rigid, deep buildup structures (such as forced 3+1 formations) often plays directly into the hands of compact, well-drilled defensive blocks.
  • Conversely, when Bursaspor abandon this over-caution—shifting to a more fluid 2+2 or width-oriented setup with active half-space rotations—they immediately unlock opponent defensive mechanisms and generate overwhelming pressure.
Psychological Resilience & Game State Transitions:
  • Matches have exposed a psychological fragility following early setbacks or unforced individual errors, causing the team to momentarily abandon their tactical blueprint in favor of panicked urgency.
  • However, secondary-half surges demonstrate that when Bursaspor embrace bravery, high tempo, and proper spatial geometry, they possess the attacking ceiling to dismantle any low block in the division.
Tactical & Betting Outlook

Bursaspor represent a fascinating high-variance profile; their capacity to completely alter a match's momentum through tactical adjustments makes them extremely dangerous. Until the technical staff eliminates first-half passivity and unifies their attacking spacing over a full 90 minutes, matches will likely remain tense, high-scrutiny affairs for analysts and observers.

Tactical Rigidity, Static Frontline, and Flawed Rotations: Anatomy of Bursaspor's First Home Defeat

📅 12 Oct 2026 - 18:10

Bursaspor suffered their first home defeat of the campaign in an encounter defined by rigid tactical setups, mismatched player profiles, and costly structural stubbornness. Operating nominally in a 4-4-2, the decision to start Lewis Baker altered Bursaspor's settled 3-1-6 possession structure into a flatter 3-2-5, immediately stripping numerical presence from the forward line. Emir Kaan was deployed as a right interior connector, Amine Boutrah tucked into the left half-space, and Kelechi Iheanacho repeatedly dropped deep to act as a linking station. With every attacker demanding the ball to feet and nobody threatening the depth behind Mardinspor's defensive line, the offensive structure became completely static.

Mardinspor executed a straightforward game plan: sitting behind the ball in a disciplined mid-block and bypassing midfield lines via direct transitions. Following an unforced defensive error from Baris that gifted the visitors an early 0-1 lead, Bursaspor abandoned collective composure and descended into chaotic attacks.

Tactical inflexibility severely hindered any recovery. With Mardinspor's front two merely shadowing passing lanes to Jorman Elitim rather than applying aggressive pressure, Bursaspor stubbornly persisted with a 3+1 build-up by tucking Zeki Yavru inside as a third center-back for the full 90 minutes. A 2+3 structure pushing Zeki higher along the touchline could have unlocked wide channels and forced Mardinspor's dangerous winger Nikolay Dimitrov to track back defensively. Instead, Dimitrov remained completely unburdened by defensive duties, preserving full stamina to dominate physical duels and seal the decisive late counter-attacking goal.

Second-half adjustments compounded these structural deficiencies. Pushing Boutrah to the center-forward position neutralized his primary asset—progressive dribbling and ball-carrying from deep—while isolating him in physical aerial duels he cannot contest. This shift also pulled Iheanacho, the team's most potent goal threat, even further away from the penalty area. Meanwhile, Baker failed to inject verticality, continuously circulating possession backward and stifling attacking momentum. Subsequent substitutions similarly fell short: introducing youthful prospect Huseyin Maldar as an emergency game-changer lacked profile suitability, while deploying Eyup Akcan as an advanced number eight rather than using him as a defensive anchor to unleash Elitim further forward failed to solve the team's creative paralysis.

⚽ Authentic Squad Formations & Tactical Insights

Welcome! Here you can explore the team squads and pitch formations for Süper Lig and TFF 1. League. All tactical ratings, positional layouts, and performance metrics are independently generated using Solo Tipster's proprietary algorithms, based strictly on official data sourced from the Turkish Football Federation (TFF).

⚠️ Disclaimer: This data is for informational and analytical purposes only. We assume no liability or responsibility for any betting decisions, errors, or omissions. 🐛 Report an Issue / Contact Us